Judith Reisman
Re-Writing the History of Human Sexuality Research
Fortunately it doesn't take long to realize the political agenda behind the "research" of Judith Reisman. After all, how seriously can one take a researcher who bases conclusions on advertisements for sex toys?
But if one is gullible enough, or if one has a rabidly anti-gay political agenda, Judith Reisman's "research" will be just the thing to mislead you into believing a large number of amazing "facts" or to provide you with material for misleading others.
If one is to believe Judith Reisman's "research" one will discover that ...
*Sexual orientation is not inborn.
*Gays know that sexual orientation is not inborn.
*The only way gays can perpetuate themselves is to seduce and recruit young
boys.
*As the gay rights movement becomes more powerful, the recruitment efforts
get more intense.
*This is why the "homosexual movement" is "pushing itself" into the schools.
*In the past, lesbians didn't recruit. But now that there are "more of them" they
have started increasing recruitment efforts.
"Alfred Kinsey was a pedophile"
"There is an organized circle of pedophiles in American academia"
*The "study" proves all of the above.
Oh ... and that the Nazi's couldn't possibly have included gays in their list of people to exterminate because the Nazis were gay themselves.
See the complete Kinsey Institute Response to Judith Reisman's Lies: "Allegations against Alfred Kinsey and his research on children's sexual responses, as reported in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, were first made in 1981 by Dr. Reisman. She subsequently enlarged on these ideas in a book written jointly with Edward Eichel and published in 1990 (Kinsey, Sex, and Fraud). When The Kinsey Institute responded, Reisman filed suit in 1991 against The Kinsey Institute, then director June Reinisch, and Indiana University, alleging defamation of character and slander. In September 1993, Reisman's lawyer withdrew from the case, and in June 1994 the court dismissed Reisman's case with prejudice (which means that Reisman is prohibited from refiling the suit)."
In her very well-documented survey of Judith Reisman's activities, Poppy Dixon arrives at the following summary.
"First Reisman 'leaves' the Captain Kangaroo show. Then she accepts over $700K for a report that both her university and the Justice Department refuse to publish. She sues the Kinsey Institute for defamation, loses, and is forbidden to try again. She appears as an expert witness at The State of Ohio vs. the Contemporary Art Center and Dennis Barrie (Mapplethorpe and Cincinnati) and the defense has her for lunch. And finally, she supports a bill introduced by a wet-behind-the-ears, born-again freshman Congressman from Texas, which never even makes it to the floor. It's unlikely Reisman could get arrested at this point. Yet what makes her dangerous is the rarely questioned nature of her writings, and her association with ultra-conservative religious policy makers."
